Let's seriously discuss an online campaign. At present, I have two volunteers, Engelhart and Pandred, who have already agreed to play, both of whom have characters already. Obviously, I would like to make a shout out to Embla, Rob, Lothar and Mikael, to learn if any of the other established players would like to take part.
Following that, I'd like to hear from others who feel they have the time. I am only interested in persons who spend a lot of time on computer, and are willing to check and update their interest in the campaign on an hourly basis, specifically during those times when we are reasonably expecting to communicate with one another. D&D is a collaborative game. Online, it cannot be played in a fashion that the participants check into the campaign once or twice a day. If we were to regularly play between 8 a.m. EST and 4 p.m. EST, then I would expect players to check on their phones or computers on average every 30-45 minutes during that time.
Alternatively, we could agree on a set period of time, 3-4 hrs per week, when everyone involved gave 90% of their attention to the game. I am not set up for visual contact, but at the same time I would be fine with people playing music, watching something or playing a video game while we played at these set times, so long as one eye was constantly on the game, so that no question asked needed wait more than 30-45 seconds for a response. Even in text, such a turn-around time could get a great deal done in a few hours.
At this time, I am ready to set up and run just Pandred and Engelhart. I would expect that others would be likely to join in once we were started, and I'm quite able to run two people. A third, obviously, would be Much better.
Take note; while I would expect participants to willingly read the Authentic Wiki, to understand the rules, I would also be more than willing to teach.
On another point, it's been suggested to me that I set up others to act as DM in some capacity. I see it as promoting the idea of advising others while they run players in the online campaign. That would be interesting, but it would involve trust and quite a bit of bravery, since it would still be on the internet and public and all. I'm open to exploring that possibility as a means of teaching people to DM better. Write and let me know what you think. Could you run a small, agreed upon sequence of dungeon rooms with me whispering in your ear in messenger, while you actually performed as DM, knowing that you could rely on my support behind the scenes?
I'll throw down however you like, same characters or new, you DMing or with a protege. I know the game will be rad.
ReplyDeleteGood day, I am interested in playing in your campaign.
ReplyDeleteMy available hours are from 11am to 6pm cst on Fridays and Saturdays, and am able to give full attention during those hours.
I am new to your system but am eager to learn. Let me know if I can fit within your schedule.
Good luck.
I will consider it, Unknown; but I should hope for more flexibility, as I wrote in the post, and for knowledge of a name.
ReplyDeleteI'm definitely interested. Most weekdays I'm online all day (save exceptions for normal life stuff here and there).
ReplyDeleteThe DM training is also intriguing but I'm not there yet. I came into the game through 5e (shudder) and I don't have much experience in AD&D outside of simply studying the material. That's no substitute for doing. So it would be something I'm interested in after I'm not a total noob.
I'm curious about the mechanics of using a wiki platform to run the game. That's pretty unique.
I'd love to play again. I've missed it a great deal.
ReplyDeletePandred, Shelby, Engelhart, Danielle; you all have my email address. The wiki will be set up in a day or so, depending on how much time my I.T. needs. I will need your full character names; we'll go ahead and play those already existing. I.T. will send you a password, which you'll be able to change.
ReplyDeleteEveryone will be set up with full powers to add and delete pages and images; in general, I hope you'll set up pages for your characters, import pictures, and feel free to communicate among yourselves through the wiki. I don't expect to be a gatekeeper with respect to this wiki's content.
At present I don't have a proposed name. Some cute names drawn at random from Oxygen Not Included are Duplicant League, Dreamland, The Death Shelter, The Optomistic Citadel, Grimy Rat's Nest, Tragic Bunker and Great Paradise. But I'm utterly open to any suggestions, so long as at least three of us agree on one.
Battleaxe Bitches: Redux
ReplyDeleteCampaign Juvenis Supreme
The Wiki Formerly Known as Juvenis
The Good, The Bad, The Ugly, and Shelby
I've got a million.
Can't go with sexist titles; I'd rather leave out Juvenis at this point; "Campaign Supreme" seems smug; I am leaning towards the good, the bad, the ugly and shelby.
ReplyDeleteI really like the idea of DMing under tutelage. I have a hard time imagining how it could be done effectively, particularly for what I would want to get out of it, but the idea is very intriguing.
ReplyDeleteAlas, I couldn't even commit to the participation level you'd need from a player right now.
That's too bad. The next one up was "Authentic Juvenis", which I was pretty sure knocked it out of the park.
ReplyDeleteWe can try another one.
"The Authentic Outing" or TAO for short.
Then why not Total Adventure Operation?
ReplyDeleteI'm... not sure what tone we're going for.
ReplyDeleteHere.
"Into Barren Lands"
"Chronicle of the Edge of the World"
"The Rogalanderlied"
"Tale of the Raider, the Reaver, the Roamer and the Believer"
Understood Alexis, this Unknown is Chris.
ReplyDeleteI teach classes during the morning and evening hours (pst) Monday through Thursday. Noon hours (pst) are flexible, which translates to 3pm cst.
Thank you for your timely response.
I concede I'm not being too serious. I'm trying a new approach: crowd pleasing.
ReplyDeleteI like "Raider's Adventure" ... anybody else?
I'm mostly just hyped to be playing again and fooling around waiting to hear someone ask me to roll a die.
ReplyDeleteAlso it's cruel to characterize us as raiders just because the first thing we did was literally to raid a tomb.
Did you raid the tomb or poke it with a stick?
ReplyDeleteYou're technically "tomb raiders" ... but I didn't go there. Correctly, the word "raider" did not exist until 1850. Reaver is more correct, meaning a "plundering forager" ... which comes from middle Dutch "rover" and German "rauber." Guess what other word comes from rauber.
Got to face it. Much of English was born out of language during a historical time when ANYONE who wasn't a stay-at-home was some identified as a criminal.
Adventurer, from the late 15 c., means one who plays at games of chance; a gambler; it meant undertaking commercial ventures from c.1600. And "one who seeks adventures" from 1660, which is later than my world takes place. Pejoratively, it means to seek fortune by rask or underhanded means. Pre 20th century, it is NOT seen as a positive thing.
If we want something neutral, I'll try, "The Adventurous D&D Wiki."
I think Rogaland Reavers is rather nice, and I don't mind a title with negative connotations - while our intentions may be noble, our methodology is dodgy at best.
ReplyDelete