All the things above have happened in the last two days and we're both tired and miserable. But still in love. Still definitely in love.
I'm not telling those stories. Yesterday, we had to do our laundry:
This is Blind River, one of many quaint little towns we've seen. It slowed down the start of the day, which was followed by interruption after interruption before we were able to get to Sudbury. Basically, it took us five and a half hours to travel a distance usually needing three. Sigh. We ended up in a little town called Laurentian Mountain, at a very backward motel.
Today went better. We made good time into Ottawa and took a walk around the Parliament buildings. For those who haven't been, when you climb up Parliament hill from the west, you can't really see the Parliament building at all. Instead, you see this in the way:
Sorry, I can't say what building it is. One of many surrounding Parliament, but I'm not up on the architecture. Perhaps someone can tell me. In any case, it's not until you get around the above building that the Parliament building appears, like a kid playing hide-and-go-seek. I believe this is intentional, to fool visitors into thinking the above is the parliament (I knew it wasn't, because I'm a Canadian), until seeing the real building.
After Ottawa, the day went precisely south, both geographically and metaphorically. That's all behind us, but we're not happy with the present motel. I'm writing this from inside the province of Quebec, at St.-Jean-sur-Richelieu. Southern Quebec is beautiful, absolutely. But navigating around it, and getting snubbed by the hotels surrounding Quebecois Lake Champlain, hasn't won us over. Still, tomorrow we're diving into Vermont. Maybe it'll be better, maybe not.
This whole trip we've been met with an unnatural amount of surliness and disregard by the low-brow tourism industry, and by shopkeepers in general. To put this in perspective, we got better service from urban Montreal cab-drivers last October than we're getting from people at Tim Hortons. Seriously.
Oh, a note about Tim Horton's, the donut place. Many people don't know this, but Tim Horton's employs an ex-shot putter when establishing any new location. Essentially, "Lars" stands at the very edge of an existing Tim Horton's, then hurls a half-pound stone as far as he can. Wherever the stone lands, that's where the location is built.
Haha! Tim Horton's has made its way into Maine. I doubt Lars could have put a shot from the nearest location to me back to any other location, however. ;)
ReplyDeleteNevertheless, it sounds similar to Starbucks' technique in the US.
There's actual geographical reasons why shops build new locations so close to each other. It has to do with customer distribution patterns. It is counterintuitive but a pretty simple concept :)
ReplyDelete"Lars" stands for "logistically accurate revenue sourcefinding."
ReplyDeletePast the depressing modern architecture, Canada seems like a beautiful country of natural wonders.
ReplyDeleteGiven the north-american reputation for revolutionizing hospitality as a business, I'm surprised at your persistent call outs for bad service (echoed from your previous journey, won in a contest at work, if memory serves), would you point the finger geographically or generationally?
Drain, I blame neither.
ReplyDeleteThe blame is firmly with a political system that depends on donations to service a media-driven agenda, which subverts any and all legislative motives against said donaters ... namely, businesses and business people, who give to ensure that minimum wage and other anti-business measures are firmly ignored by any and all politicians, regardless of party.
This builds resentment in the low-wage front face of nearly any business associated with tourism, from front desk clerks to food servers. Knowing they'll NEVER be compensated for performing better work, while continuing to be seen by employers as disposable and replaceable, it's natural to adopt a surly attitude towards ANYONE who can afford to stay at a hotel, buy goods, drive a nice car, etcetera. The attitude towards workers these days is even to refuse a raise (or give pathetic raises of 30 cents), since a good attitude or positivity is viewed with suspicion from above (if you're in a good mood, you must be stealing from the company).
This attitude is becoming pervasive in every low-wage business, everywhere. And having started, it's not going to start without serious change in the distribution of wealth.