So, some notes on the podcast.
I've done three interviews now, with a fourth being set to be recorded this evening. I don't want to give any notes on the past that will jinx any of the interviews going forward, but I do think there are some things I can say with some fairness. Particularly as I have now begun cutting audio for final copy.
Having an agenda as a guest is a bad idea. Not because the agenda is wrong or because we shouldn't have agendas ... nay, I'm all for a good, solid agenda, whether or not it supports my viewpoint. However, I'm finding that an agenda tends to blot out the guest's preparedness to just talk about stuff. Once the agenda is off their chest and on tape, I'm finding the wherewithal isn't there to start a new conversation on a new subject. I've had two guests enter the interview with this approach.
It is beginning to look like one of the three interviews just isn't going to work because of this ~ which is a damn shame, but this is a learning process. I can tell you from experience, not every journalism interview ends in a story, not every screenplay gets produced, not every pilot gets picked up for a series and not every book gets published. It is the way of things.
It would be worse if I ignored the facts and published the podcast anyway ... for the present, however, I'm still thinking I can save the interview in the editing process.
As regards that, there are still things I am learning about sound, as well. I have to adjust my mic going forward, or else I'm going to have to fix everything I say in editing (I am just too damn loud at this time). That's already mounting up to be a big job.
My plan is to collect 13 interviews and run them over 13 weeks. At the moment, I have 11 guests, including the three I've done ... so I just need two more. After the 13 week run, I intend to have a 3-month hiatus, and then begin recording for another 13 episodes, most likely with a different theme. This will make two series a year, with three month breaks in between.
It is pretty ambitious, and perhaps it won't work. Still, I'm not crippled by the editing (I kind of like it, actually, it is sort of relaxing), and I am certainly comfortable in the chair interviewing guests. I think, too, that hearing me speak humanizes me in a way that my writing does not.
When will the first podcast run? Not sure. I'd like to have a number of episodes in place before I start to broadcast them.
At the same time, a part of me says, "Fuck the TV schedule crap." Why not just release the podcasts when they're finished, like any other content I release on the net? I admit, I'm less and less convinced that people rush to the net to search for a podcast they know is being released on a given day. We may be witnessing the end of culture's infatuation with scheduled content ~ and that is not necessarily a bad thing.
If I released all 13 podcasts on the same day, some people would binge; some people would listen to a few and punk out. Some would half listen to some, listen all the way through others. It would be uncertain, for sure.
But releasing them week by week is no better. People would listen to this week's, then forget next week and the week after, only to vaguely remember there were podcasts, search and find three waiting for them.
I think the only reason to release them one at a time is so that I can highlight each individual episode on the blog, on facebook and on twitter. But in that case, who cares what the period between podcasts is? Five days, ten days, two days ... whenever the next one is up, I'm going to write about it anyway, and subscribers are going to get told. So a weekly schedule just isn't necessary.
These are thoughts in my mind as I settle in to edit, and as I continue interviewing. What happens, happens. Watch this space for more information.